Case: “continue the pre-Assembly or outsource it?”

Continue the pre-Assembly or outsource it

STARTING SITUATION:

The producer was faced with the choice: continue the pre-assembly activity or outsource this work. The factory had been pre-assembling itself for years. The employees themselves had already taken measures more often in order to become more productive. In order to maintain the work in the plant, a study was needed to increase workplace optimisation. The basic question also revealed that the MTM standard times also needed to be revised. Now, a better combination does not exist. Because every change is immediately measurable. Areas, number of employees and savings follow from the analysis.

CHOSEN APPROACH:

Firstly all the existing standard times were updated. In parallel, the layout of the departments, tools, and the supply and goods delivery were examined. Paths are shown by spaghetti-diagrams. By classifying potential improvements in a short, medium and long term, the benefit per phase became

clear (with investments, change of methods, etc.). Together with Logistics ABC-delivery has been chosen, to reduce the m2 and  thereby shorten paths.

During the creation of a matrix, with all recommendations per phase, a chart is also coupled. With that, all savings per phase become visually clear. This helps the management make choices and implementation easy.

Pre_Assembly choice
Gradually more productive

Before the implementation, the analysis and improvement proposals are discussed with representative employees, which increases acceptance.

RESULTS:

The pre-Assembly department is kept at the factory. By updating the standard times, small method adaptations and small investments, the number of full-time employees could be reduced from 9 to 7. Also through steady delivery of source materials, shortened transport and walk paths. An additional advantage is that the delivery to the assembly line is in sequence from now on.